Thursday, October 11, 2007

dance of the (un)dead

dancing partners. who needs 'em? well we all do as it happens. both metaphorically and really. but just keeping to the dance arena for the moment, if you ain't got a partner why bother?

of course you can preen and strut all you like in your own girational statement. you can shake your booty and casino turn till your body pops in a wild orgasm of rhythm if you so desire. and the assembled wallhangers can marvel or snigger at your skill, or lack of it, as the spirit moves them. but really, if you ain't got someone to hang on to, yours is a truly solitary vice.

personally i reckon a partner is a must. and there's the rub so to speak. just who is this lucky person going to be? who are you going to invite?

for the purpose of this short reflection i'm going to stick to lasses. in salsa, at least where i dance, not many boys dance together. and to be honest, as far as i am concerned girls are more fun.

some say you don't need to make too much of it. the relationship is only going to last for a few minutes after all. a few brief twirls and out before you move to the next beautiful blossom with whom to redefine your conception of personal space and shake that funky thing. so it could be anybody really.

or could it?

that few minutes cuddling up to a fun honey is nearly always over way too soon. but pairing up with the wrong lady can broach an eternity of excruciating faux pas through which to fumble before silently disengaging and hurrying to opposite ends of the room.

there are of course ladies who are crap dancers. they don't have a clue because they've only been doing it for a week or two. they are tense and want to keep their arms by their sides i imagine to protect their bosoms from uninvited manhandling.

they should be so lucky. firstly that isn't going to happen. secondly their chests would be perfectly safe in my hands ... but it still isn't going to happen. and thirdly by the time they've been at it for a few more weeks they won't give a fig anyway.

dance virgins tho they may be these girls are not always the chore they think they are. if they don't actually fight and aren't contrary enough to resist your lead it can be rewarding helping them build their confidence. you can tell that soon some of them will be much better than you are anyway so why not help them now.

anyone who sticks with it obviously will improve. there are plenty of ladies who are very good. tho conversely this doesn't necessarily make them great partners.

apart from whether or not they are prepared to take a lead it also depends on why they want to dance. maybe its an exhibition? maybe they are signaling their physical perfection to a prospective mate? or maybe its a status thing and they want to demonstrate their position in the strutting hierarchy. if that's the case, unless you are more than mortal yourself forget it. you won't get a look in.

so it doesn't have much to do with your partner's dance skill, its really about their innate sense of rhythm and much much more about their attitude. how they feel about themselves and how they see you. and how much they trust you.

everybody's different of course and occasionally someone turns up who stakes out new territory in dance partner land. janey for example is both crap and haughty. and brings a whole bundle of baggage when she condescends to stalk across the floor. its not that she hasn't tried to absorb the groove, its just that she is naturally arrhythmic. not clumsy exactly just slightly, consistently and unpredictably off the beat.

maybe she compensates for this with attitude? its difficult to be sure but being unpleasant certainly seems to be a cornerstone of her technique. so not only is her movement erratic she also enjoys an abrasive personality.

and with janey the lack of fun doesn't stop there. even to touch her is somehow not a pleasant experience. its as if she carries a resentment which makes her uncomfortable in her own body and which she communicates through her skin.

its not a hygiene issue. trust me, you dance with someone you know whether they're clean or not. also its not a skin disease. there are no warts, or acne or scars or scabs. none of that. well not in the physical dimension that is. its just difficult to find her edge. you know, where she starts and stops. she feels formless. and cold as if, were you to sleep with her and be lucky enough subsequently wake up, you might find yourself suffering from a kind of spiritual hypothermia.

so maybe any consideration of dance partners also needs to recognize the cosmic, angry icebergs of the dance scene. those chill, life threatening presences in the pulsing sea of femininity that are best avoided. the janeys in other words.

but make up your own mind. for me, i've spotted her and am going to maintain my course round that particular eruption of emotional anti-matter. from now on i'll cuddle the ladies who are warm and willing.

i know it makes sense.

peace, love and no mittens,

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh dear Patrick! something tells me your feathers have been ruffled by your encounter with 'janey'. Can't work out from your writing whether you're a closet misogynist masquerading as a decent guy or just someone who needs a cuddle...Hmmm I'll need to think about that. Enjoy the gig tonight
X

Patrick Ellis said...

oh dear, anonymous! still afraid to declare yourself. you are a timid little bunnykins aren't you?

but to the meat: misogynist? me? if i were a misogynist i certainly wouldn't be misogynising in a closet. i'd be up on my back legs and doing it from the roof tops.

however i am not a misogynist but i do find it interesting that when a chap criticizes a member of the opposite sex, as he might one of his own gender, he runs the risk of being labeled a social deviant. have i missed something? while lawyer blair was doing his best for the boys by massively increasing the legislative canon, thus improving their opportunities to charge huge fees, did he actually make it illegal to criticise a lady? or do ladies never do anything that could warrant criticism? (my anxious intuition is that you may subscribe to the latter school of thought.)

imperfect memory tells me that even smarmy little tone didn't actually manage to get the infallibility of women onto the statute book. so if i am right and i can still challenge a chick without being sectioned or deported might it not be beneficial for all concerned to let me get on with it and for the object of my criticism to respond and rebut as a rational individual without scurrying for the sanctuary of the umbrella of political correctness?

and while we're discussing the gender agenda how come no-one knows the word for the female corellation of misogyny? yes what do you call a woman who cherishes a deep and irrational hatred of men? or is that thought itself also actionable? perhaps there are no such women. what do you think?

so pick the bones out of that one sweet pea.

and if you're so keen for a cuddle just be nice to me.

Anonymous said...

Patrick, sweetie..you can't half get your knickers in a twist sometimes. One of the downsides of e -communication I guess -what you may have imagined as being a sneer may have actually been an affectionate smile playing about my lips as I typed my last comment. Anyhoo, let me put your 'anxious intuition' to rest. I hold my hand up high to being a weak and feeble human being. Fallible, certainly - cowardly, indubitably (more of a wallflower than a sweetpea actually). I have no misguided loyalties to my own sex and if there is a female correllation of misogyny I for one would never darken its doors. I love men!(in small doses, at appropriate times etc etc) Oh and by the way, how clever of you to have turned around my inference that you might be in need of a close personal embrace to suggest that it is in fact moi that is lacking in that department. How very dare you ! Although if you're offering....
Apologies for my cowardly anonymity, give me time, give me time....
x

Patrick Ellis said...

not sure who brought 'weak and feeble' into the debate but we'll let that one pass.

so ok, in general terms you're forgiven - on condition that you stay nice.

but if you think for one moment i'd consider jumping into bed with someone who won't even tell me her name ...... you obviously know me pretty well.

on an literary note what are your thoughts on janey's unmasking?

Anonymous said...

P -am all in a lather now! This online flirting has got me all hot under the collar. Not sure of the etiqette in these situations being a blog virgin myself,but have just read some previous entries of yours and now have to declare that I am actually, officially in love! Seriously though (and this is the one and only sincere comment you will get from me)I absolutley LOVE your writing -the political stuff is a bit, oh alright then WAY, above me but after reading your reminisences of playing in Port Talbot in the 70's I had to go and lie down in a darkened room with a cold cloth over my eyes to compose myself, such were the stirrings that your words evoked ( Oh Mr D'arcy...!) Re janey's unmasking I confess I actually tried to google 'Norma de guerre' to see who the hell she's supposed to be! Obviously being witless enough not to have recognised the reference. Perhaps I can be forgiven -I am clearly no match for your intellectualism but also I suspect you imagine that I am someone from your salsa class and would have had 'inside info' to help with identification of said sepulchre . However I am not -just a besotted admirer. And as for your invitation -I may take you up on that one day ...and sooner than you think.
x

Patrick Ellis said...

look for a definition of nom de guerre and all will be revealed.

as far as being in love with my writing is concerned ... who can blame you? although i do prefer LURVE if you're interested.

still awaiting your response on the janey question, which was really about the feisty.

with regard to quenching your ardour ... i could probably fit you in tonight. with the proviso that you are female, have one head and are no older than me. also you must be at least 21. or possibly 18. or maybe 16 if you promise not to be sick after a glass of wine. or .....

unfortunately am busy the rest of the week.

peace and love on a roll.

XX

Patrick Ellis said...

first of all ..... don't take it too personally. there may not be a joke there after all. or if there is it may not be aimed at you. i just want a response on whether the feisty idea works or not.

secondly .... with reference to the time - 19:07 - of your last comment, which in deference to your preference remains unpublished on my hard drive, i do find that a bag of chips can prove very consoling. especially when we haven't had our tea and are feeling a bit grisly.

thirdly ..... i would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge my debt to you. i do feel that my literary career has really started to get airborne now that i've got a blog stalker of my very own. i await melvin's call as i type.

'keep it coming,' as the actress ....

Anonymous said...

Howdy! Just to let you know that very unfortunately I will have to miss your performances this weekend as so called friends have let me down at the last minute and I don't fancy standing by the bar like a Billy no mates! Shame that -I was really looking forward. Thought I'd let you know as I'm sure you'll be able to play all the better, safe in the knowledge that you're not being observed by a mad 'stalker'. I look forward to seeing your next blog instalment (and if I may I'd like to put in a request for some more 'down memory lane' type entries).
PS Sorry if I'm messing up your blog by adding to the comments on this one entry but it just seems to be the place that we meet. For now.

X

Patrick Ellis said...

hi anon,

pity you missed friday. saturday was ok .... sort of.

it occurs to me that you aren't who you appear to be. or at least not who i originally thought you appeared to be. so i'm even more confused than ever. although someone i expected to turn up didn't so maybe you are she or she is you or i am the egg man goo goo ga choo.

take sweet care of yourself. not only because you are a significant percentage of my readership, and i am nothing if not loyal to my readers, but also because you may be a tender, passionate soul adrift in the dream between birth and death and as such deserve compassion and kindness.

peace and love.

ps. for more 'memory lane' pieces trawl wrandom writing. start right at the beginning. they only happen by accident.